ResearchVerify

When more than one lab tests the same batch, we line up their results side by side. When they match, it is the strongest signal you can get. When they do not, that is information too. Here is what these labs found — you decide.

2 independent labs tested this batch of BPC-157 from LiliPeptide.
Not enough data to compare

These labs did not report enough overlapping numbers to line up cleanly.

On the actual amount per vial, the labs were far apart (6.1 to 9.0 mg).

Scores land close · Poor · 4.7

The two badges above are our blended RV-score view: whether the scores agree, and the overall quality tier. The plain read at the top leads with the labs actual purity numbers, and the full per-lab table is below.

BPC-157 from LiliPeptide
batch November 5, 2025 · cross-tested by 2 independent labs

The blended RV scores land within 0.5 to 1.5 points of each other. The RV score mixes purity with other factors and can read as agreement even when raw purity does not — so weigh the raw purity range shown above.

✓ Batch identity basis: Same physical sample (Finnrick multi-lab program)
All records carry Finnrick (FNR-*) task IDs, meaning one physical vial was routed by Finnrick to multiple labs and each lab tested it independently. This is the strongest basis for 'same batch' — there's no batch heterogeneity between labs because there's no batch difference: it's the same vial.
🧞 Identity caveat — Arginate vs acetate salt = same peptide, different salt; merge but track salt for content basis.
⇄ Weak-lot label — multiple products grouped together. This page groups records by the vendor's batch label, but the records span 2 distinct labeled dose products (5mg, 10mg). The aggregate Content Mean / Range / CV stats above mix different products; the per-dose breakdown below is what to read instead. Vendor batch labels like calendar dates often cover multiple physical lots and SKUs.

Per-dose breakdown — the meaningful view

Within each labeled dose, content should cluster tightly around the labeled amount (with some overfill). Cross-dose averages aren't a meaningful summary of this group.

5mg labeled — 1 test Single test
Mean: 6.10 mg
Range: 6.10 mg
Variation:
Labs: BTLabs
✓ consistent with label
10mg labeled — 1 test Single test
Mean: 8.97 mg
Range: 8.97 mg
Variation:
Labs: Krause Analytical
✓ consistent with label
Labs
2
Tests
2
RV Score Mean
4.74
RV Score Spread
0.60
Content Mean (mixes products — see above)
7.5 mg
⚠ Content diverges
Content Range (mixes products)
6.1–9.0 mg
CV 19.0%

Per-Lab Breakdown

All rows (Purity & Content vary, everything else constant): Label 7.0 · Custody 4.3 · CI 10.0 · Method HPLC
LabTaskTest DateProduct (labeled)RVPurityContentTestingLabelCustodyCIMethod
BTLabs#FNR-q7eetcv5mg
BPC-157 5mg
5.0499.2%6.1 mg2.77.04.310.0HPLC ~
Krause Analytical#FNR-5e8yxcg10mg
BPC-157 10mg
4.4496.23%9.0 mg1.27.04.310.0HPLC ~
Why this matters: A single COA is one lab's answer from one method on one sample. Multiple labs reveal the pattern. When labs converge on the same answer, that's strong cross-validation. When they diverge — especially on content while agreeing on purity — the difference is often method-driven (different quantitation basis) but sometimes signals real product variation. ResearchVerify is the only platform that surfaces both cases automatically across thousands of cross-tests.