Research Verify

When more than one lab tests the same batch, we line up their results side by side. When they match, it is the strongest signal you can get. When they do not, that is information too. Here is what these labs found — you decide.

2 independent labs tested this batch of MOTS-c from Eros Peptides. Their purity results ranged from 99.5% to 99.6%.
The labs agree

Independent labs landed within 2 points of each other on purity. That is the strongest signal you can get on a batch.

On the actual amount per vial, the labs were nearly identical (12.4 to 13.9 mg).

⚠ One lab came back sharply different from the rest (flagged and highlighted in the table below). It counts toward the range above but is pulled out of the agreement math.

⚠ Mild disagreement · Fair · 6.1

The two badges above are our blended RV-score view: whether the scores agree, and the overall quality tier. The plain read at the top leads with the labs actual purity numbers, and the full per-lab table is below.

MOTS-c from Eros Peptides
vendor batch label "ABS2293" · cross-tested by 2 independent labs

Labs differ by 1.5–3 points. May indicate batch variation, method differences, or test timing.

ⓘ Batch identity basis: Vendor-claimed batch: 'ABS2293'
Grouped by the vendor's batch label. We don't independently verify lot identity — if multiple physical lots were sold under this label, they'd be lumped together here. Use the agreement signal with appropriate caution.
⇊ Canonical merge — Records using different spellings/names for the same compound were grouped under the canonical MOTS-c. Source names: MOTS-c, MOTSC 10mg. Verified by the synonym resolver.
Disagreement, but method data is sparse. Disagreement detected but method data is missing on too many records to attribute the cause. Once more records in this group carry resolved method info, this verdict will sharpen.
Labs
2
Tests
5
1 unparsed
RV Score Mean
6.10
RV Score Spread
2.28
Content Mean
12.9 mg
✓ Content agrees
Content Range
12.4–13.9 mg
CV 4.5%

Per-Lab Breakdown

All rows (Purity & Content vary, everything else constant): Label 7.0
LabTaskTest DateRVPurityContentTestingLabelCustodyCIMethod
Freedom Diagnostics#26052703826.5699.59%12.6 mg6.57.05.282.0not stated by lab
Freedom Diagnostics#26052703836.5699.63%12.8 mg6.57.05.282.0not stated by lab
Freedom Diagnostics#26052703846.5699.45%12.4 mg6.57.05.282.0not stated by lab
Freedom Diagnostics#26061803516.5699.16, 99.12, 99.14%13.9 mg6.57.05.282.0not stated by lab
JanoshikOUTLIER#706884.28——0.87.04.310.0not stated by lab

Unparsed records (1) — excluded from agreement math

LabTaskTest DateStatus
Freedom Diagnostics#260527038505/27/2026unparseable — excluded from agreement math

These records lack parseable score, purity, and content fields. They're shown here for transparency but don't contribute to the cross-lab agreement statistics above.

Outlier detected. One or more records in this group are statistically unusual (|z-score| > 2.0) compared to the others. Highlighted rows above show the flagged tests. Common causes: differing test methods, lab calibration drift, sample handling, or a genuinely heterogeneous batch.
Why this matters: A single COA is one lab's answer from one method on one sample. Multiple labs reveal the pattern. When labs converge on the same answer, that's strong cross-validation. When they diverge — especially on content while agreeing on purity — the difference is often method-driven (different quantitation basis) but sometimes signals real product variation. ResearchVerify is the only platform that surfaces both cases automatically across thousands of cross-tests.